How to choose a Workiva consultant or implementation partner

Compare providers by their experience with your project, testing approach, and support for your team after handoff.

The short answer

Match the provider to the work. A large program across many reports and teams needs a firm with depth and project management. A focused report, a repair of an existing setup, or specialized work such as GRC or custom data often suits a specialist who does the work directly. Whichever you choose, ask who will actually do the work, how they test, and what your team will be able to run afterward.

Match the help to the work

Situation What usually fits
Many reports and teams at once A larger firm, or Workiva’s own services team
One report or process to implement well A firm or an independent specialist
An existing setup that is fragile or inherited A specialist with repair experience
A SOX program move with methodology changes A firm with SOX advisory depth, or a GRC specialist working with your auditors
A budget book or designed publication A specialist in that report type
A custom data model, Wdata, or an integration A specialist with data and connection experience

Questions to ask

  • Who will do the work? Get names, and ask how much of the build they will do themselves.
  • What have you built that is like ours? Ask them to walk you through how it is structured.
  • How do you test? Look for a full prior-cycle test with corrections and review, run with real user permissions.
  • What will our team be able to do afterward? Ask what the handoff includes and whether your operator will run a cycle before the engagement ends.
  • What do you need from us, and when? A good provider is specific about sources, decisions, and access.
  • What is out of scope? Clear boundaries prevent the most common disputes.
  • Overview
  • Many reports and teams
  • One report or process
  • A fragile or inherited setup
  • Who will do the work
  • How they test
  • What your team can run afterward

Red flags

  • A timeline promised before anyone has seen your sources.
  • No plan to test a complete cycle.
  • A handoff that is only a walkthrough or a document.
  • Pressure to rebuild everything when you asked about one problem.
  • Vague answers about who does the work.

Before you talk to anyone

Gather a recent example of the report, its source files, your next deadline, and a short note on what is slow or unreliable. The implementation readiness guide lists what helps most.

Common questions

Should we use an independent Workiva consultant or a large firm?

Match the provider to the work. A large, multi-team program benefits from a firm with depth and project management. A focused implementation, a repair of an existing setup, or a specialized report often benefits from an experienced specialist who does the work directly.

What should a Workiva consulting proposal include?

A defined scope tied to specific deliverables, what the client must provide and when, how the work will be tested against a real cycle, what the handoff includes, and what is out of scope.

Comparing Workiva help?

Describe the report or process you want in place and your next deadline. Every engagement starts with a fixed-fee Workiva diagnostic.

Start a conversationWorkiva financial reporting consulting