Workiva GRC, built around your team.

Bring risks, controls, evidence, and audit work into a clearer process. Lockfield configures and improves Workiva GRC around your responsibilities, review steps, and reporting needs.

All services

GRC work needs ownership at every step.

We shape the records, requests, reviews, and follow-up around the people responsible for moving the work forward.

SOX & internal controls

Put control documentation, evidence collection, testing, and follow-up into a consistent workflow. Connect risks to controls, clarify ownership, and make outstanding work easier to track.

  • Risk and control records
  • Evidence requests
  • Testing and review workflows
  • Issues and remediation
  • Status reporting

Internal audit

Support the work from audit planning through fieldwork, findings, and follow-up. Configure Workiva around your audit methodology, with clear review responsibilities and a consistent way to track open actions.

  • Engagement structure
  • Workpaper and review workflows
  • Findings and action tracking
  • Audit reporting

Enterprise risk management

Build a risk register your team can maintain. Organize assessment criteria, owners, and response plans, then shape reporting for management and board review.

  • Risk taxonomy
  • Assessment workflows
  • Ownership and response tracking
  • Management and board reporting

A new setup—or a better next cycle.

The right starting point depends on the process in front of you. A GRC engagement can begin with a new implementation or a focused improvement to what is already there.

Implement.

Translate the agreed process into a configured solution, with migrated records, tested permissions, and a practical handoff.

Improve.

Resolve inconsistent records, unclear ownership, cumbersome reviews, or reporting gaps without rebuilding what already works.

Connect and train.

Scope data connections, make maintenance responsibilities clear, and practice the team’s own workflows.

An exception should lead somewhere.

Evidence is only useful if the next step is clear. A review needs an owner, an action, and a way to confirm closure.

Illustrative control-review workflow Illustrative process, not product UI
  1. Evidence requestedOwner receives the request
  2. SubmittedEvidence enters review
  3. ReviewedReviewer checks the record
  4. Review completeNo exception identified
More evidence neededReturn to submission with a clear question
Exception identifiedRemediation assigned to an owner with a due date
Closure reviewedRemediation evidence is checked before closure

Start with the process that needs to work better—not a requirement to rebuild everything.